Molecular Genetics Faculty Handbook

https://moleculargenetics.utoronto.ca/report/molecular-genetics-faculty-handbook

Research and Education Mission

Faculty in the Department have a double research and education mission: the core value is excellence in research. However, it is equally important to pass this on to the next generation of students through commitment to teaching. The expectations of our faculty are:

  • Excellence in research
  • Outstanding education in the field, critical analysis, and creative and critical thinking
  • Physical and psychological safety
  • Ethical research and teaching
  • Service to society both through research and teaching
  • Equity and breaking down barriers related to affluence and privilege (lack thereof)

Important Resources

The Faculty Handbook is a complement to the Graduate Handbook for students. Faculty are expected to be familiar with both handbooks.

Both handbooks provide important information, context and useful resources.

Characteristics of exemplary faculty: Collaboration, Integrity, Exemplary Conduct, Supportiveness, Respect, Profound Expertise, Cultural proficiency

The PSME committee created this handbook to help faculty in all our programs (i.e. undergrad, Medical Genomics, Genetic Counselling and research programs), and across all our nodes, be exceptional mentors and educators.

We recognize that there may be sections of this handbook that may address certain aspects not relevant to all programs/nodes. Nonetheless, this handbook is intended to be an informational guide, a formal statement of our values and expectations, and an updated policy reference.  It should be the ‘first stop’ for any faculty member who has a question about procedures and policies that relate to teaching, mentorship, and research operations that involve undergraduate, graduate, and post-doctoral learners. This handbook should sit alongside any handbook/policies that may already be in place for your node/program.

The degree requirements for students in our programs are linked in this Faculty Handbook and its contemporaneous Graduate Student Handbooks and the Arts and Science Undergraduate Calendar.  We will make every effort to ensure that the Faculty Handbook will be updated simultaneously with the student guides to ensure they harmonize.

The work you do isn’t easy. A faculty member in a department like ours is expected to be a deeply knowledgeable scholar and a leader of their field. At random and intense intervals, faculty must also be an administrator, a fundraiser and money manager, a classroom teacher, a coach, a committee member, a meeting organizer, a seminar speaker, an equipment fixer, a journal editor, a grant or paper reviewer, a conflict resolver, and a competent navigator of complex personnel (and personal) issues.

We acknowledge that faculty with multiple appointments must do more work (twice the meetings) and that this can lead to confusion and fatigue with respect to policies and expectations. We also understand that these roles are layered on top of the vital work most faculty members do in their communities.

So more than anything else, we would like to acknowledge the work of our faculty, who, despite many challenges, have led groundbreaking programs while training hundreds of exceptional scientists, clinicians and leaders. It's your hard work and commitment that makes our department truly outstanding!

The members of the Professional Standards in Mentorship and Education Committee.

Core principles and mission

Medical science building

Administration and Governance of Graduate Education

Our three graduate education programs (research M.Sc. and Ph.D., M.H.Sc. in Medical Genomics, M.Sc. in Genetic Counselling) are administered collaboratively with the School of Graduate Studies (SGS) and the Temerty Faculty of Medicine.

SGS, upon our recommendation, admits students into, or removes students from, our departmental programs. Even seemingly mundane changes to the curriculum (including student seminars) must be reviewed and approved by SGS for their compliance with university policies. The Temerty Faculty of Medicine’s Harmonized Base Funding Agreement currently governs the stipend amount and top-up policies for students in all eight Basic Science departments.

Other offices can take the lead in particular situations.  For example, students with disabilities who register with Accessibility Services are given specific support and legal protections.  Molecular Genetics must follow any directives from Accessibility Services with respect to such students, and it is illegal to deny students access to education because of a disability in most circumstances.

Graduate Education Administration - Who Does What?

The School of Graduate Studies (SGS), Temerty Faculty of Medicine, and the Department of Molecular Genetics collaborate to manage distinct responsibilities.

School of Graduate Studies (SGS)

SGS oversees all UofT graduate programs across all three campuses (UTSG, UTM, UTSC) and sets policies and standards that include:

  • General requirements for the completion of a graduate degree
  • Graduate admissions procedures and initial handling of applications
  • Fees and fee schedules
  • Graduate transcripts and academic records
  • Governance and quality assurance
  • Administrative approvals of new graduate courses
  • Administration of PhD examinations, including rules about external examiners and the faculty members that need to be present
  • Leaves of absence, stop-outs, and withdrawals from programs
  • Academic appeals
  • Adjudication and investigations of research and academic misconduct

Temerty Faculty of Medicine

Temerty Faculty of Medicine, mainly through its Vice Dean of Research and Health Science Education, also governs specific items that affect research and education.  Specific examples include:

  • Student stipend levels (via the Harmonized Stipend Agreement)
  • Departmental budgets
  • Space assignments and allocations
  • Faculty workload
  • Student and faculty code of conduct
  • Faculty/staff hiring, cross-appointments, and promotions (under the oversight and standards set by the Provost via the Office of People Strategy, Equity and Culture)

Department of Molecular Genetics

The Department develops and administers educational programs in undergraduate (BSc) education (in Molecular Genetics and Microbiology), graduate research in Molecular Genetics, and two professional master's programs (MSc in Genetic Counselling, MHSc in Medical Genomics).  It is the administrative entity that is most proximal to both students and professors, and it carries the load for the vast majority of day-to-day business.  Its financial office helps coordinate and administer departmental funds and oversees the spending of research funds by the faculty whose primary appointments are in Molecular Genetics (other on-campus labs associated with Molecular Genetics may fall under the umbrella of the Donnelly or the Department of Biochemistry). In addition to the funds held by budgetary faculty whose primary appointments in MoGen, our admin office also manages NSERC and CFREF funds held by status-only faculty with primary appointments in MoGen.

Faculty appointments and how they impact expectations

The Department has many cross-appointed faculty from other units both on campus (from Biochemistry, Donnelly, and IMS), and ‘status only’ faculty from research institutes and others off campus (SickKids, LTRI, OICR, UHN).

Regardless of the nature of the faculty appointment (full, cross, status-only) all members of the faculty are expected to adhere to the Department’s standards for conduct in addition to those they may are required to uphold through other units.  This is particularly true for rules surrounding safety, professional conduct, and mentorship.

There are many examples where similar training may be required in both off-campus research institutes and by our Department.  We do our best to ensure that faculty are not overburdened with redundant meetings and training sessions (e.g. two different classes on lab safety when one is sufficient).

Policies all faculty must know and follow

This section briefly covers some of the key policies that everybody in our department, especially faculty, are expected to know and comply with. Policies described below are not subject to debate and no exceptions are made due to academic freedom.

WHERE TO FIND THE MOST UPDATED VERSIONS OF UNIVERSITY POLICY

Official university policies by the Office of the Governing Council

Workplace Policies by the Division of People Strategy, Equity and Culture

Graduate education policies by the School of Graduate Studies

Promotions and advancement policies are found in the Academic Administrative Procedures Manual.

Policies on the conduct of research, including intellectual property, inventions, commercialization, external partnerships, sharing of resources, human and animal research, and general lab safety (biological, chemical, radiation), are maintained by the Division of the Vice-President, Research and Innovation (VPRI)

Policies relevant to undergraduate education in the Faculty of Arts and Science Academic Handbook for Instructors and the Academic Calendar

 

University policies related to workplace and classroom conduct

Code of Behaviour on Academic Matters

Link and pdf (July 1 2019)

This policy provides a general framework to understand the UofT position on ‘academic matters’ that include classroom assignments and publications.

It is an offense to knowingly:

  • Plagiarize or claim credit for work not one’s own.
  • Falsely impersonate another person.
  • Forge or falsify a document.
  • Use unauthorized aids (during exams and assignments).
  • Submit, without the knowledge and approval of the instructor to whom it is submitted, any academic work for which credit has previously been obtained

The document also extensively outlines the procedures for adjudicating academic offenses committed by students and faculty. 

The Rights and Freedoms Enjoyed by Members of the University

All members enjoy the right to the fullest possible freedom of inquiry.

This includes:

  • the freedom to communicate in any reasonable way, and to discuss and explore any idea;
  • the freedom to move about the University and to the reasonable use of the facilities of the University;
  • the freedom from discrimination on the basis of race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, creed, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, family status or handicap;
  • the freedom in respect of offices, lockers, residences and private papers from unjustified invasions of privacy.

In addition, all members enjoy the following freedoms in relation to their freedom of association:

  • the freedom to hold and advertise meetings, to debate and to engage in peaceful demonstrations;
  • the freedom to organize groups for any lawful purpose;
  • the freedom of the reasonable use of University facilities for the purposes of any lawful group.

Code of Student Conduct

Link and pdf (December 13 2019)

This is a broad policy document that outlines the expectations, rights/responsibilities, with respect to student conduct while conducting their studies and interactions with university members. Given the complexity of student interactions with and within the university, the standards are kept general and vague.

In Section B.1 the code lists what constitutes an ‘offence’, which includes:

  • Students may not commit, or threaten to commit, physical violence against any member of the university community. Firearms are not allowed on campus (exception: a peace officer or a member of the Canadian Forces acting in the course of duty).
  • Students may not damage, vandalize, or take property that is not their own.
  • Students may not destroy, deface or vandalize University of Toronto property.  This also includes data, lab notebooks, books, film/video, computer files, etc.
  • Students may not use university resources for things that are not part of the university mission (e.g., using university computers, photocopiers, etc, to start a private business).
  • Students may not engage in vexatious comments directed at others on the basis of any of the protected grounds in the Ontario Human Rights Code (race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age, marital status, family status, or disability). Vexatious comments are those that could reasonably be expected to be unwelcome by the recipient. It is not necessary that the victim of such comments be present for the comments to violate this policy (e.g., making offensive comments behind a peer’s back).

These standards apply to all activities on campus, as well as to any off-campus activities sponsored by the University (e.g., a retreat). They can also apply to off-campus interactions between university members if the behaviour affects interactions with members of the university community (e.g., stalking a fellow student, unwelcome comments made during a student study group at a coffee house off-campus).

The policy outlines the procedures for adjudicating violations in section C. This includes how investigations are conducted and how investigators are appointed. Section D outlines the ‘interim procedures’ - or how to treat the alleged offenders and victims in the period before formal decisions are made. Section E lists sanctions that range from a written reprimand to expulsion from the university.

Workplace Violence

Link and pdf (February 2, 2022)

This policy states university-wide expectations, policies, and procedures, with respect to violence and intimidation (threats) in the workplace or classroom. It is a more specific implementation of the law as outlined in the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act.

Workplace violence is defined in the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act as follows:

  • The exercise of physical force by a person against a worker, in a workplace, that causes or could cause physical injury to the worker.
  • An attempt to exercise physical force against a worker, in a workplace, that could cause physical injury to the worker.
  • A statement or behaviour that it is reasonable for a worker to interpret as a threat to exercise physical force against the worker, in a workplace, that could cause physical injury to the worker.

The University of Toronto is committed to maintaining a workplace that is free of violence. Any act of workplace violence is unacceptable conduct that will not be tolerated. No one shall subject any employee to workplace violence or allow or create conditions that support workplace violence.

An employee who subjects another employee to workplace violence may be subject to disciplinary action up to and including the termination of their employment. A student who subjects any employee to workplace violence will be subject to penalties under the Code of Student Conduct. Others who subject any employee to workplace harassment will be subject to penalties that are appropriate in view of their relationship to the University.

Penalties from the University will occur separately and in addition to whatever penalties the assailant might be subject to via the criminal and civil justice systems.

Workplace Harassment

Link and pdf (February 2, 2022)

This policy states university-wide expectations, policies, and procedures, with respect to harassment in the workplace or classroom.  It is the university's implementation of the law as outlined in the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act.  This policy overlaps in scope with the workplace violence and sexual harassment policies.

‘Workplace harassment’ is defined in the Occupational Health and Safety Act as:

  • engaging in a course of vexatious comment or conduct against a worker in a workplace that is known or ought reasonably to be known to be unwelcome, or
  • workplace sexual harassment.

“Workplace sexual harassment” means:

  • engaging in a course of vexatious comment or conduct against a worker in a workplace because of sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression, where the course of comment or conduct is known or ought reasonably to be known to be unwelcome, or
  • making a sexual solicitation or advance where the person making the solicitation or advance is in a position to confer, grant or deny a benefit or advancement to the worker and the person knows or ought reasonably to know that the solicitation or advance is unwelcome.

Workplace sexual harassment also falls within the scope of the University of Toronto Policy on Sexual Violence and Sexual Harassment.

An employee who subjects another employee to workplace harassment may be subject to disciplinary action up to and including the termination of their employment.  A student who subjects any employee to workplace violence will be subject to penalties under the Code of Student Conduct. Others who subject any employee to workplace harassment will be subject to penalties that are appropriate in view of their relationship to the University.

Penalties from the University will occur separately and in addition to whatever penalties the harasser might be subject to via the criminal and civil justice systems.

Sexual Violence and Sexual Harassment

Link and pdf (January 1, 2023)

This Policy applies to all Members of the University Community.  It contains a statement of commitment and outlines specific procedures by which the university will monitor and address sexual harassment/violence towards (and among) members of its community.  It is updated every three years as required by Ontario Bill 132.

Key points:

  • The University has created the Sexual Violence Prevention and Support Centre (SVPSC) as a central expert body to avoid actual or perceived conflicts of interest or reasonable apprehension of bias, to preserve privacy, to minimize risk of reprisal, and to ensure coordination and consistency across all academic divisions, campuses, and centralized services.
  • People who seeking services and advice via the SVPC may do so through several levels of interaction.  They may anonymously request information about the process and get general advice about options.  They may ‘Disclose’ a specific incident and receive many types of support without triggering any further investigations or actions.  They may also choose formally ‘Report’ an incident, which will alert the administration and initiate a formal investigation into the allegations (and will necessarily involve informing the ‘Respondent(s)’ against whom the allegations are made).  Choosing to Disclose does not prevent someone from filing a Report later.
  • People who experience sexual harassment/violence have “autonomy in decision-making, and in particular with respect to whom to Disclose, whether to Report, whether to pursue recourse to the criminal or civil justice systems, and whether to access support and accommodations”.  Victims of sexual harassment/violence may have reasons they do not wish to Disclose or Report an incident and should not be pressured to make a decision.
  • The Reporting procedure and the processes it initiates apply to all Incidents of Sexual Violence in which both the Complainant and the Respondent are Members of the University Community, regardless of whether the event occurred on campus, off campus, or using social media or other electronic media. Support will be made available under this Policy to Complainants regardless of whether the Respondent is a Member of the University Community.
  • The University will treat Disclosures and Reports of an Incident of Sexual Violence in a confidential manner and in accordance with the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.  Confidentiality cannot be maintained in exceptional circumstances, such as when information needs to be disclosed to address a risk to the health and safety of Members of the University Community, or where the University is obliged by law to disclose the information (e.g., involvement or endangerment of a minor, immediate risks to safety).
  • The University will limit sharing of information within the University to those who need to know the information for the purposes of implementing this Policy and/or other University policies, including providing accommodation, interim conditions and interim measures, and the investigation and decision-making processes; and taking corrective action resulting from those processes.
  • Those who in good faith make a Disclosure or Report about sexual violence will not be subject to discipline or sanctions for violations of the Code of Student Conduct or other University policies relating to drug or alcohol use at the time the alleged Sexual Violence occurred.

A companion guide is available to provide more information about this Policy to students.

University policies related to research integrity and ethics

Policies and procedures regarding research ethics and scientific misconduct are maintained by the Division of the Vice President, Research & Innovation (VPRI).

Ethical Conduct in Research

Link and pdf (March 28, 1991)

The University of Toronto released this policy in 1991 and has not updated it since.  It is a one-page outline, broad and deliberately vague as to what specifically constitutes ‘ethical’ (or unethical) research.  Because of the tremendous breadth of research at the University, and the rapid pace of progress in different fields, the University placed responsibility for implementing more specific policies on offices and committees more proximal to the work itself (e.g., VPRI, Local Animal Care Committees, the Human Research Ethics Unit, etc.).

“Research misconduct” refers to any research practice that deviates seriously from the commonly accepted ethics/integrity standards or practices of the relevant research community and includes but is not limited to intentional fabrication, falsification and plagiarism as defined by the University’s Code of Behaviour on Academic Matters.

The University considers that the highest ethical standards in research entail (not exclusively):

  • The accurate presentation and interpretation of experimental data and other information.
  • Due acknowledgement to another’s work.
  • Maintaining confidentiality with respect to information supplied by another when requested and appropriate use of that information in a manner authorized by the supplier of the information and in accordance with scholarly practice.
  • The appropriate use and allocation of money or other resources supplied for research purposes.

Research Involving Humans

Current policies on research involving human subjects are maintained by the Division of the Vice President, Research & Innovation.

‘Human research’ is not limited to biomedical research conducted directly on living subjects (e.g., drug safety in a clinical trial).  It may also include work done on samples extracted from human subjects, living or deceased.  It can also include research that ‘gathers information’ about humans including surveys and community-based research.

It is important to understand when it is necessary to obtain approval for research that might involve human subjects.  If you have any doubts about whether your work requires approval from a human research ethics board/committee, you should visit the VPRI website, which has an excellent section dedicated to helping you navigate this topic (including navigating human studies involving multiple stakeholders and international collaborators).

All research involving human subjects must be reviewed by The University of Toronto’s (U of T) Human Research Ethics Unit (HREU).  The HREU was created to ensure that all research conducted at the university (including studies done in partnership with other institutions) complies with Tri-Agency requirements as well as provincial legislation and institutional policies.

Ethics in Human Research

Federal and provincial regulations: In 2001, Canada's three federal research agencies, CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC, jointly created the Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics as part of a collaborative effort to promote the ethical conduct of research involving human participants. This Panel develops, interprets and implements the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (TCPS).  The TCPS policy was released in 2018 and updated in 2022.

Navigating the Ethics of Human Research

 

Animal Research

Current policies on research involving animals are maintained by the Division of the Vice President, Research & Innovation.

Federal and provincial regulations:  All research and teaching involving animals is governed by the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) and the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA).  U of T holds a Good Animal Practice certificate from the CCAC and is in good standing with Animals for Research Act requirements.

University oversight structures: The Animal Ethics and Compliance Program (AECP) at U of T is run through the University Animal Care Committee (UACC) and the Research Oversight and Compliance Office (ROCO).  More proximal oversight is provided by the many Local Animal Care Committees (LACCs) around the three campuses. 

LACCs provide supervision, coordination, and review of every project proposed to include the use of animals. Each committee includes scientists, non-scientists, and members of the public to encourage representation of diverse viewpoints. These committees have the responsibility to approve, to require modification of, or to prohibit a project’s use of vertebrate animals.

Tri-Agency Framework for Responsible Conduct of Research

Link and pdf (2021)

This is not a university policy, but established by the Tri-Agency (Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC)).

Relevant extracts from the framework:

  • [...] duties of honest and thoughtful inquiry, rigorous analysis, commitment to the dissemination of research results, and adherence to the use of professional standards.
  • Responsible Conduct of Research is the behavior expected of anyone who conducts or supports research activities throughout the life cycle of a research project (i.e., from the formulation of the research question, through the design, conduct, collection of data, and analysis of the research, to its reporting, publication and dissemination, as well as the management of research funds). It involves the awareness and application of established professional norms, as well as values and ethical principles that are essential in the performance of all activities related to research. These values include honesty, fairness, trust, accountability, and openness.
  • Note that the framework also includes an obligation to train students on this topic:
    All researchers are responsible for familiarizing themselves with principles of responsible conduct of research and for the application of these principles to foster a positive and constructive research-working environment. Researchers with oversight roles should provide appropriate supervision of, and training to, their trainees and research personnel in responsible conduct of research.

University policies pertaining to equity and human rights

Disabilities and Accommodation

“It is the University's goal to create a community that is inclusive of all persons and treats all members of the community in an equitable manner. In creating such a community, the University aims to foster a climate of understanding and mutual respect for the dignity and worth of all persons.

In working toward this goal, the University will strive to provide support for, and facilitate the accommodation of individuals with disabilities so that all may share the same level of access to opportunities, participate in the full range of activities that the University offers, and achieve their full potential as members of the University community. The University will work to eliminate or minimize the adverse effects of barriers, including physical, environmental, attitudinal, communication and technological barriers, that may prevent the full participation of individuals with disabilities in the University community. The University will meet the accessibility needs of members of the University community with disabilities in a timely manner. The University will provide the members of its community with opportunities for education and access to information regarding disability and the University's policies on disability.”

From the Statement of Commitment Regarding Persons with Disabilities [February 25, 2021]

The term "disability" is defined as follows in the Ontario Human Rights Code:

  • any degree of physical disability, infirmity, malformation or disfigurement that is caused by bodily injury, birth defect or illness and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, includes diabetes mellitus, epilepsy, a brain injury, any degree of paralysis, amputation, lack of physical co-ordination, blindness or visual impediment, deafness or hearing impediment, muteness or speech impediment, or physical reliance on a guide dog or other animal or on a wheelchair or other remedial appliance or device.
  • a condition of mental impairment or a developmental disability.
  • a learning disability, or a dysfunction in one or more of the processes involved in understanding or using symbols or spoken language
  • a mental disorder
  • an injury or disability for which benefits were claimed or received under the insurance plan established under the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997.

Students should request accommodations through Accessibility Services

Faculty and Staff should request accommodations through by contacting their chair or their divisional HR office or Health and Wellbeing Programs (HWB).

Accommodation Guidelines for Employees with Disabilities

The process: Getting accommodations for a disability is a straightforward, but formal, process that requires evaluation, documentation, planning, implementation, and monitoring.  Confidentiality is respected and policies are very clear as to who in the University can or cannot have access to information about someone's disability status and its causes.

In most cases the University will request medical documentation of the disability (shared only with those who need the information).  A meeting is called to discuss best accommodation solutions, a written plan for the accommodation is drafted, and follow-up appointments are conducted to update or end the plan as necessary.  Unionized staff will also be represented by their respective unions throughout this process.

As part of this process, employees may request accessible formats or communications supports. The University will consult with individuals to determine the most appropriate accessible format or communication support. Any plans for alternative or accessible communication should be included in the employee’s accommodation plan. Faculty and Staff will usually have workload reduced and often work from home.  In some difficult cases, staff may be reassigned to a position that is less impacted by the disability.   

Students will generally receive supports including note-taking services, sign-language interpreters, recorded lectures, and extended deadlines on tests and assignments.  In some cases, students can be provided with personal assistants. 

The costs of providing these services are typically covered by the University.

Other policies

Inventions, intellectual property, and external partnerships

There are many cases where your work may involve collaborations with external partners and stakeholders.  It is essential that you make yourself aware of the various policies surrounding issues like inventions, intellectual property, and conflicts of interest.

Conflict of Interest - Academic Staff, Policy on [June 22, 1994] - [View PDF Version]

Inventions Policy [October 30, 2013] - [View PDF Version]

Trademark Licensing Policy [May 11, 2000] - [View PDF Version]

Publication Policy [May 30, 2007] - [View PDF Version]

Research Administration Policy [October 30, 2013] - [View PDF Version]

Research Partnerships, Statement on [February 1, 2007] - [View PDF Version]

Federal, non-university Guidelines:
National Security Guidelines for Research Partnerships - View PDF Version
Introduced by the Government of Canada, the National Security Guidelines for Research Partnerships aim to ensure the Canadian research ecosystem is as open as possible and as secure as necessary. The purpose of the guidelines is to integrate national security considerations into the development, evaluation, and funding of research partnerships.

Key federal and provincial regulations

University of Toronto policies are written to comply with provincial and federal regulations including those listed in the Criminal Code, the Ontario Human Rights Code, the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act, Bill 132, and University of Toronto Act.  Many federal and provincial agencies issue specific mandates as well.  For example, biosafety rules are administered and enforced by the Public Health Agency of Canada and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. 

The Ontario Human Rights Code

The Ontario Human Rights Code is cited in several university policies, especially those that relate to hiring, management, promotions, and how members of the community treat each other.  The Code prohibits actions that discriminate against people based on a protected ground or social area.

The 14 protected grounds -

Every person has a right to equal treatment without discrimination because of their...

  • Age
  • Ancestry, colour, race
  • Citizenship
  • Ethnic origin
  • Place of origin
  • Creed
  • Disability
  • Family status
  • Marital status (including single status)
  • Gender identity, gender expression
  • Receipt of public assistance (in housing only)
  • Record of offences (in employment only)
  • Sex (including pregnancy and breastfeeding)
  • Sexual orientation.

The following protected social areas are situations where discrimination may not occur:

  • Accommodation (housing)
  • Contracts
  • Employment
  • Goods, services and facilities
  • Membership in unions, trade or professional associations.

Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act

The primacy of the Ontario Human Rights Code is enshrined within the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA).

UofT's Office for Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) delivers online and in-person training, as well as provides outreach and resources among other support services.

One aspect of AODA is website accessibility, and we encourage you to build your lab webpage according to the criteria outlined in AODA. Please consult the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Quick Reference and note that the AODA requires meeting Level A and AA criteria (with the exception of 1.2.4 and 1.2.5). Accessibility checkers are available here.

Expectations for students we mentor

a female scientist in a lab doing an experiment

What constitutes an MSc/PhD degree in our graduate research program?

The fundamental requirement of the MSc is to generate publication-quality data that reaches a significant conclusion. The data might constitute only a portion of a complete paper. In other words, the student's work should culminate in at least a couple of publication-quality figures or tables that they produced themselves and can interpret on their own. The student should be able to propose detailed experiments for the future that are based on their work. (Find the full MSc requirements here)

The fundamental requirement of the PhD is to make a contribution to knowledge. First-author research publications are the standard evidence that this requirement has been met. Papers also illustrate that the students can finish projects, and can document and interpret their work. It is thus a standard expectation that PhD projects would lead to such publications, and that graduates would strive to obtain first-author publications during their thesis studies. However, obtaining a PhD in the Department is not dependent on the work being published at the time of graduation. While it is preferred that the student has participated in at least one manuscript submission, the completion of the degree should not be delayed by publication strategies or lengthy review processes that are beyond the control of the student. (Find the full PhD requirements here)

Students in the M.Sc. program have to take the reclassification exam if they want to transfer into the PhD program. Fundamentally the reclass/qual exam is designed to assess whether students are PhD ready in terms of their critical thinking, background preparation, ability to produce publication quality data and to communicate their scientific objectives and results both orally and in a written format. The examination format uses the socratic method:  after the student presents their project (an uninterrupted 20' talk), examiners will take turns asking series of related questions to initiate a discussion designed to measure the depth of a student's knowledge pertaining to their field, their experiments and the project they propose to undertake for their PhD. The committee wants to see that a significant biological question (in the context of the field) has been identified,  that a robust and feasible experimental plan has been put forth to address it and that the student has a thorough understanding of the relevant background and methods to accomplish the proposed work (which should lead to a publication unit). (Find the full reclass criteria here)

The University of Toronto has outlined general expectations for MSc and PhD degrees.  While they are sufficiently vague to cover degrees ranging from music to molecular genetics, they provide some clear guidance about what level of expertise and proficiency is expected: Graduate Degree Level Expectations (utoronto.ca)

See the following documents regarding degree level expectations

three women (one professor and two students in white coats) in a lab
How to best support our students

Expectations for mentors

General expectations

Teaching contributions: This is outlined in the workload document (a copy is available upon request from the Chair's office) and set in conjunction with the Chair.

Serving on committees: Theoretically, you should serve on 2 thesis committees for every student in your own lab. For other committees, everyone should serve on at least 1, balancing workload and interests. This is not enforced though, and you are encouraged to say no to committee requests if you are overburdened, and to consider agreeing if you are on fewer than 7 committees.

Expected turn-around time for response to emails: Be responsive, responding within 1-3 business days, depending on urgency. Clarify times of availability. Consider making yourself available to your trainees through other channels (MS Teams, Slack, Discord,...)

Frequency of one-on-one meetings with students: At a minimum, have regularly scheduled meetings once per month. The ideal may vary depending on stage of education, but every other week or every week would be better. Please set this time aside specifically/block it off.

Feedback for students: Attend student committee meetings, student seminar presentations, qualification and thesis exams. Prepare your students by providing feedback on the slides and reports, by doing a practice talk, and helping the student tell a good, scientifically thorough and effective story. Note that Ph.D. students are strongly encouraged to write a draft of their first-author manuscript, and we encourage you to guide them through the entire process of publishing a paper.
Course coordinators are expected to provide
timely and sufficient feedback to students in the course.

Exam preparation: Provide feedback on the written report prior to the reclass exam. Do not provide word-by-word feedback, but ensure that the quality of scientific writing, of the data figures and legends, referencing is suitable. Report writing is a core learning opportunity for your students, and your guidance is important. Students should expect to have 4 weeks in April to prepare for the reclass exam with no new experiments, only having to do lab maintenance.

Exam scheduling: it is a supervisor's responsibility to schedule and coordinate the process of MSc and PhD exams (including communication with the external examiner) within timelines required by the department and SGS.

Quality assurance: Ensuring a MSc or PhD thesis is appropriately written, organized and complete before it is sent for comments from the committee members.

Inclusive communication: We encourage open discussions about student concerns (academic and non-academic), to practice and promote empathy in the workplace, ensure equitable access to opportunities. Ask student for correct pronouns and preferred name, and try to accommodate any important holidays, celebrations or practices – student should at outset disclose these if dates are known in advance.

Continuation of communication:  If your student is not making themselves available for meetings, not responding to emails or otherwise not making progress, please notify the Graduate Coordinators and Learning Strategist for assistance with the situation.

Supporting course work: Your students will be taking courses, particularly in early years of their graduate studies. Allow students to devote time to these courses, because if students don’t pass, they risk having to leave the program. The courses also help prepare your students for their exams, and exam performance will be better if students master the course content.

Administrative tasks: Supervisors need to report any payroll change (external awards, program transfers, leave of absences, withdrawal/graduation…etc.) to the Business Officer who processes graduate stipends. Otherwise, overpayment may occur that cannot be recovered.

Lab / project onboarding information

To help students settle in your lab, to give them easy access to information, and to make sure they get all the relevant information, we suggest you share the certain information from the onset. Consider creating an onboarding booklet as outlined here:

Lab orientation booklet

  • Supervisory roles and responsibilities. At the outset, discuss supervisory style and also student style for receiving feedback (e.g. in person, virtual, email,  immediate, take some time to reflect, etc..)
  • Have clear expectations and identify the roles of each member in the research (collaboration)
  • Office hours (maybe more for junior students), best times and methods to contact research mentor
  • Some helpful tidbits, e.g. how to prepare for research meetings/presentations, writing publications, which conferences to attend, links to grants/fellowships/internships
  • Important contact numbers at U of T – e.g. Mental Health and Wellness, Health clinic, DEI office, writing workshops for grad students, postdocs, RAs, etc
  • Include any rubrics used to evaluate students for transparency
  • Time off policy is defined in the graduate handbook. Describe how personal days should be scheduled and communicated.
  • Sick Days – how many days? Who to contact?
  • Orientation to the lab (who's who), equipment, safety, etc..

We suggest you convey this information in an “orientation booklet” for your students. An example of a MoGen PI's lab handbook can be downloaded here.

These two articles have good explanations of why lab manuals are useful and also have  links to examples: Nature, eLife. HIAS also has several examples under "Lab Guidelines & Onboarding".

Equity, Diversity and Inclusion

At the Department of Molecular Genetics we strongly believe in the importance of equity, diversity, indigeneity, inclusion and accessibility (EDIIA). We aim to foster a diverse student body and research community where individuals from different backgrounds, experiences, and perspectives come together to drive progress. We expect our faculty to take part in these efforts, to create a safe environment for all our members and in particular to make it a welcoming place for Black, Indigenous, and People of Colour who are underrepresented in our student and faculty population.

We encourage you to seek out learning opportunities in this space: peruse the resources shared here, and consider taking training.

Departmental funding policy

Supervisors should familiarize themselves with the Policy on Funding & Program Length found in the Graduate Handbook. Here are some key points to be aware of:

  • For students who began in September 2024 or later:
    • PhD students are guaranteed five years of funding, and will be automatically granted two additional one-year funding extensions, as long as they have maintained good academic standing and met program requirements in the previous academic year. After seven years, funding must end.
    • MSc students are guaranteed three years of funding, with one automatic one-year extension, under the same conditions. After four years, funding must end.
    • If students obtain ‘permission to write’ within a funded period, students will also be funded through the defence and submission of Supervisor-approved corrections to their thesis to SGS, as long as the defence occurs within the standard timeline after permission to write (6 months for PhD and 4 months for MSc).
  • Students who began their program before September 2024 (September 2023 start and earlier) receive stipend coverage for the full duration of their program, including coverage of the standard writing period (see above), as long as they maintain good academic standing.
  • Maintaining good academic standing requires meeting departmental and SGS requirements, especially the requirements to regularly hold committee meetings:
    • MSc students and 1st/2nd-year PhD students must hold committee meetings once every six months, following departmental deadlines (by March and by September/October).
    • PhD students post-qualification/reclassification exam must hold committee meetings once per year, following departmental deadlines (by May).
    • Funding renewal is dependent holding meetings; it is not conditioned on particular levels of performance.
    • Formal Leaves of Absence pause committee meeting requirements.
  • The stipend may also be interrupted if a student fully disengages from the program (being physically absent from the lab and courses, and unresponsive to communication) for more than one month, without any prior notification of the absence (see "How to proceed with a student who has disengaged from the program" for details).
  • Note from the GEMS Agreement: Funding for all students must end when they submit their final, post-defence thesis (“completion date”). Ending stipend coverage for funded students is typically handled by prorating by month in the final year. PhD tuition is similarly prorated. Since MSc tuition is not prorated by month (they are billed for full terms), final-term MSc students should generally be paid living allowance prorated by completion date, but full tuition for the corresponding term.

This policy clarifies that students must meet required deadlines in order to continue receiving funding. As such, it’s critical that supervisors and committee members support students by:

  • encouraging them to hold meetings well in advance of deadlines,
  • reiterating the departmental stance that committee meetings are discussions of work in progress and not recommending delays to await more progress or better results,
  • prioritizing meeting participation (when given adequate notice), and
  • making clear arrangements for sabbaticals and other leaves.

This policy also puts in place hard funding limits for incoming cohorts of students: Seven years for PhD students and 4 years for MSc students. Students may continue to register in the program beyond these limits via Program Extensions, but cannot continue to be funded (with the exception of writing periods that began within the limit). Accordingly, it’s critically important that supervisors and committees guide students in planning and undertaking work with a very high likelihood of completion within these timelines.

The minimum expectation for graduation is that PhD students produce one to three publication-quality data chapters, and that MSc students’ theses contain at least a couple publication-quality figures or tables (see “What constitutes an MSc/PhD degree in our graduate research program?”). Supervisors and committees must determine whether a student’s work is sufficient in quantity and quality to meet the degree minimums; however, they may not force students to meet higher requirements if the student has demonstrably met the requirements and wants to graduate.

In some cases, students and committees may agree that the student’s career goals would be served by producing more work, and the Department is supportive of this, up to the funding limit. But for students who are reaching the limit, or for the many students whose career goals are not served by producing additional work, committees should assess progress directly based on degree requirements. Research output can also be boosted by graduating the student and retaining them in a short postdoctoral or staff position.

Expectations for committee members

  • Aim to maintain equal standards of student supervision across the Department.
  • Attend (in person) student committee meetings, student seminar presentations, qualification and thesis exams. Facilitate scheduling by being responsive and dependable.
  • Provide honest and fair assessment of student progress and work  (committee meeting reports, presentations, qualification exams, graduate thesis) in a timely manner as per the student handbook.
  • Understand the requirements/milestones the student needs to fulfill in each meeting and provide guidance related to degree completion.
  • Provide advice relating to topics course choices for completing major milestones (reclass/qual exam, thesis defense).
  • In areas that need improvement, provide actionable feedback to the student (suggest additional courses to address deficiencies in background knowledge, provide constructive feedback on experimental strategies, possible pitfalls, etc.).
  • Provide additional expertise relevant to the student's project.
  • Support and advocate for the student in the event of conflicts with supervisor.
  • Write reference letters in support of student award applications and career progression.

Suggestions for mentorship of rotation students

  • Meet regularly with students (onboarding meeting, halfway through rotation, exit meeting)
  • Appoint a (willing!) student to be a direct mentor for the rotation student
  • Appoint a student ambassador from each lab that incoming recruits can reach out to if they have any questions regarding the lab
  • We encourage transparency (i.e., discuss if the number of available permanent positions depends on grant results)
  • Complete the template for the faculty profile carefully with your post for a position
  • We advise faculty to update their lab websites as a excellent means of recruiting students
  • Consult with current students about whether rotation student meets defined expectations

Administrative notes about rotation students

During a student's rotation period, the stipend is paid through the Department. Once a student has settled into a permanent lab, payment of the stipend is administered through the node at which the student is located. The final thesis lab for each student will be invoiced by the Department for the entire stipend paid to the student during the rotation period.

If a student leaves the Department at any time after joining a lab, that lab will not be reimbursed the stipend costs incurred during the rotation period by the department or any other lab.

If the student switches labs within a 4-month period (excluding all initial rotations) of joining the first lab, the second lab will fully reimburse the first lab for covering the stipend costs during the rotation period upon request by the first Supervisor. If the student switches labs after the 4-month of being in the first lab (excluding all initial rotations), but before beginning their 9th month, the second lab will reimburse the first lab for half of the stipend costs during the initial rotation period upon request by the first Supervisor. If the student switches labs after the completion of 8 months, the second lab will bear no responsibility for the costs of the student's stipend during the rotation period. In this case, the expense for the stipend during the rotation period will remain with the first lab. If a student leaves the Department at any time after joining a lab, that lab will not be reimbursed the stipend costs incurred during the rotation period by the department or any other lab.

Mentoring undergrad students

Follow the section of the handbook on undergraduate teaching. Ensure that the students receive training in safe laboratory practices, as well as thorough training in laboratory techniques. Make yourself available for meetings, and assign a willing and qualified supervisor.

Postdoctoral fellows

To find postdocs, consider publishing ads in general purpose venues such as Nature and Science, and in specialized field specific job platforms, conferences and journals. Use your professional network, circulate the ad as widely as possible, contact colleagues directly as well as use conferences to interview current PhD students.

Faculty who wish to engage a postdoctoral fellow via the University of Toronto are encouraged to review this SGS resource. Please refer your postdocs to our resource page for MoGen postdocs.

Mentoring postdocs, as described above for grad students, requires regular meetings, timely feedback on experiments and manuscripts, and open communication. Provide opportunities to explore and develop career goals, especially since many will want to go on the job market after leaving your lab. You are strongly encouraged to complete and discuss an Individual Development Plan (IDP) early in their tenure and at least once a year.

Postdocs will bring new skills and approaches from their PhD work to your lab, which will often benefit your research, and your other research trainees may benefit from their expertise. Consider research projects that provide more independence in research design, and that promote leadership skills, such as mentoring experience to junior students and trainees.

Encourage postdocs to take advantage of the community and scientific resources that the Department and Faculty of Medicine provide, for example departmental seminars and events, and LinkedIn. Postdocs in Molecular Genetics labs in all of our research nodes are welcome to participate.

Career mentoring

  • Complete and discuss the Individual Development Plan (IDP) with graduate students each year. The IDP provides a context and an opportunity for students to consider their progress and goals as they advance in the graduate program, both relating to their research and career development. The IDP can also be a valuable tool for Postdoctoral Fellows.
  • Point the students to the Career Development Resources collected on our website.
  • Encourage attendance of MoGen career events such as the annual Career Symposium.
  • Consider supporting conference attendance to allow your students to expand their professional network.

 

Internship requests

Please refer to the graduate student handbook for the full guidelines on managing students' requests for internships.

Note that supervisors cannot facilitate paid internships (e.g. at their own company) while continuing to allow students to be registered and collect the stipend, as this is a violation of the terms of the Harmonized Base Funding Agreement.

External communication

  • It will greatly improve the visibility of your lab if you have a lab website. We recommend you actively maintain it to keep it current. Students looking for rotations will appreciate the insights, and for many of your students this website will be a credible online presence.
    We suggest that you build your lab website according to AODA criteria.
  • For additional visibility, consider personalizing your profile on DiscoverResearch. In order to do this, log into Elements to take ownership of your profile and customize it. We encourage you to add “Media Enquiries” to the “Availability” labels for your profile to also appear in the  U of T's Blue Book, the site where journalists look for topic experts when they want to get a U of T scientist’s expert opinion. There is help available at manage your profile, the DR Community Site or by reaching out to discover.research@utoronto.ca.
    Carefully select keywords that describe your research; keywords can be synonyms and should include specialized and non-jargon terms. If you do get contacted by a journalist, consider reach out to mogen.news@utoronto.ca for support and to let us know of your contribution so we can further promote your publicity.
  • Share information for newsletter with us: If you have exciting publications coming up, you or your students received an award, or if you are working on a special project interesting for a wider community, please send an email to mogen.news@utoronto.ca. We like to feature members of our engaged community and celebrate you and your students!
  • We recommend you create a profile on Temerty Medicine Connect, the professional social media platform of our faculty. This is an excellent way to stay connected with graduates from your lab, and models a great way for the students to maintain their network.

Being a good mentor

Good supervision and mentorship

Recognizing good mentorship is easy when you observe the following attributes in supervisors: they provide guidance, clearly set expectations, offer feedback, remain accessible, assist in establishing a supervisory committee, aid in understanding policy and regulations, promote academic integrity, foster a supportive environment, and avoid conflicts of interest (Source: SGS Graduate Supervision Guidelines).

Examining mentorship: Contrasting insufficient and supportive mentorships

Explore the impact of mentorship through contrasting, hypothetical examples of detrimental and supportive relationships. Discover a mentor's role in shaping personal and professional development.

Insufficient Mentorship Example

Sarah, a dedicated graduate student, is part of a research lab led by Dr. Johnson, a renowned but temperamental principal investigator. During a lab meeting, Sarah eagerly presents her progress on her research project. However, when she makes a minor mistake in her explanation, Dr. Johnson interrupts abruptly, raising their voice and reprimanding her in front of everyone. Dr. Johnson criticizes Sarah's competence, belittles her intelligence, dismisses her attempts to explain the mistake, all while micromanaging the details of the project. Sarah feels humiliated and demoralized, and her confidence shatters. The incident tarnishes the mentor-student relationship, leading to a strained and unsupportive environment in the lab. Other students witness the incident and become hesitant to seek guidancehindering collaboration and stifling productivity. The negative impact of Dr. Johnson's poor mentorship weighs heavily on Sarah, affecting her motivation and overall well-being.

Supportive Mentorship Example

Emily, a graduate student, works in a research lab led by Dr. Anderson, a renowned and supportive principal investigator. Despite feeling underprepared for her research project, Emily receives guidance and resources from Dr. Anderson.

Recognizing Emily's challenges, Dr. Anderson schedules a one-on-one meeting to address her concerns. They discuss the specific areas where Emily feels underprepared and frustrated, and Dr. Anderson offers reassurance, explaining that it's normal to feel overwhelmed. During the meeting, Dr. Anderson provides guidance by breaking down the tasks and developing a roadmap to prioritize Emily's work. They explain fundamental concepts, share relevant resources, and encourage Emily to explore different strategies and ideas.

Over the following weeks, Dr. Anderson maintains regular check-ins with Emily, providing constructive feedback and creating a supportive environment. Emily appreciates the mentorship, gains confidence, and makes significant progress on her research project. Dr. Anderson acknowledges her improvement and dedication.

In this scenario, Dr. Anderson's supportive mentorship helps Emily overcome her initial struggles. Through guidance, resources, and regular check-ins, Dr. Anderson creates a positive environment for learning and growth, enabling Emily to gain confidence and make significant progress in her research project.

Get support when unable to support students

Mentoring students is a privilege. Therefore, we expect our faculty to uphold the values of the university and serve as an example of excellence.

We recognize that difficult times can happen during the career of a faculty members, and that your health and personal circumstances may not always allow you to serve as a good mentor. If you feel that at this time you are not able to give your students the best experience, the Department will help find co-mentors for your students. This will give you the space to sort out your situation and resume effective mentoring. Please seek out the support of the Chair and the program coordinators.

Consequences of insufficient mentorship

Your duties as a mentor are outlined in the SGS Graduate Supervision Guidelines. Failures of mentorships have negative consequences on student outcomes, departmental and lab morale, and the quality of the science that society receives. Note that ongoing ineffective mentorship is bad mentorship too. Therefore, the Department reserves the right to intervene in situations where PIs are not meeting their obligations as supervisors.

In cases of mentorship shortcomings despite following due process of documenting and communicating of concerns about previous instances of inadequate mentoring, or in cases of severe violation of university guidelines, the Department reserves the right to deny a PI access to future students in our undergraduate and graduate programs.

Mentorship protocols

How to prevent, monitor for, and deal with academic misconduct and research fraud

We recommend you foster a culture of transparency and open conversation about academic integrity in your lab. It is good practice to

  • Check in regularly and set expectations.
  • Set out clear expectations for data production and record keeping.
  • Encourage or require the use of electronic lab books for transparency in sharing raw data.
  • Monitor lab notebooks and ask to see raw data.
  • Encourage lab members to repeat key experiments.
  • Discuss case studies of research misconduct, for example in lab meetings.
  • Make sure students undergo research ethics and data manipulation training.
  • Be aware of, and communicate, guidelines about the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in course work, graduate theses, research journals etc., including the departmental Guidelines on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence found in the Academic Honesty Section of the Graduate Handbook.

Note that the Tri-Agency created a research integrity framework that mandates us to train our students in the topic of research integrity.

In the unfortunate situation that you are dealing with a case of research misconduct in your lab, seek out guidance from your chair, and refer to the framework and procedure outlined by the Division of the Vice-President, Research & Innovation.

How to support members of our community struggling with mental health

As a member of the MoGen community, you will be called to do more than guide the academic and scientific progression of your trainees. In some instances, you may be confronted with active or incipient mental health challenges in other members of the community, and knowing what to do (and where to look for help) in these situations will allow you to support the general wellbeing of the students, staff, postdoctoral fellows and faculty members around you.

Some supervisors and embedded committees will be able to provide clear mentorship and support for these challenging situations, but this is not something we expect every faculty member to have competence in. That having been said, it is recommended that all trainees, staff, and faculty members across the Department of Molecular Genetics work through the asynchronous Identify, Assist, Refer training module.

If this is an emergency – if you believe there is a threat to your safety or to the safety of someone around you – call 911 or Campus Police (416-978-2222)

 

Who needs support?

The procedure of Identify, Assist and Refer is the same regardless of who needs support, however, the points of contact are different. Please select the appropriate stream, depending on whether you are looking to support undergraduate students, graduate students, or staff and faculty members.

   Undergraduate students

IDENTIFY – If an issue is suspected or disclosed

Students may demonstrate a pattern of behaviour that suggests an active or incipient mental heath concern.

In the laboratory environment (e.g. summer student, work-study student, undergraduate thesis student) this might include, but is not limited to:

  • Ceasing attending the lab, or creating disruptions in the lab
  • Not communicating with their direct supervisor in the lab, and being unresponsive to email or phone outreach
  • Failing to complete work to the same degree of competency that they have previously demonstrated
  • Being visibly / obviously sad, upset, angry, or agitated

In a course / classroom environment, this might include but is not limited to:

  • Ceasing to attend lectures, tutorials, or laboratory sessions
  • Not handing in assignments
  • Missing tests, midterms, or exams
  • Being visibly / obviously sad, upset, angry, or agitated

If you notice a concerning behaviour, invite open communication. Ensure that your students know that they can talk to you, and that there is a pre-defined way for them to connect with you (e.g. clearly posted office hours), and that they are free to discuss issues that are affecting their academic progress without judgement.

Alternatively, an undergraduate student may approach you to disclose a mental health concern. In either case, being able to recognize when someone is experiencing a mental health challenge is an important first step in helping them.

If you have specific safety concerns at this stage, you may require an immediate referral or intervention. If the situation is an EMERGENCY, call 911, or call the urgent Campus Police number (416-978-2222). If the situation is URGENT but is not an emergency, you might consider calling the Student Crisis Line (416-946-7111) or UofT Health and Wellness (416-978-8030; select option 5 to connect to reception immediately) – these services are available during business hours only. Examples of specific safety concerns include:

  • References to self-harm or harm to others (including you)
  • Confusion, disorientation, disconnection from reality (written / verbal)
  • Expressions of hopelessness, helplessness, or worthlessness (written / verbal)

ASSIST – Figure out how to best help an undergraduate student

If you’re concerned about one of your undergraduate students, consider providing specific examples that highlight your reason(s) for being concerned. This will let the student know that you are open to listening, and gives them a chance to speak directly to the indicators you’ve presented. Consider the following procedural elements to this conversation, which apply whether you have approached an undergraduate student with a concern, or if a student has approached you:

  • Choose a safe space to have the conversation – best practice for in person meetings, keep your office door open, even if just a little bit
  • Validate their feelings / disclosures, and listen actively
  • Do not promise confidentiality – you may not be able to keep their secrets
  • Avoid giving advice
  • Instill a sense of hope – whatever the issue is, there will be a way to navigate it

If you have specific safety concerns at this stage, you may require an immediate referral or intervention. If the situation is an EMERGENCY, call 911, or call the urgent Campus Police number (416-978-2222). If the situation is URGENT but is not an emergency, you might consider calling the Student Crisis Line (416-946-7111) or UofT Health and Wellness (416-978-8030; select option 5 to connect to reception immediately) – these services are available during business hours only. Examples of specific safety concerns include:

  • References to self-harm or harm to others (including you)
  • Confusion, disorientation, disconnection from reality (written / verbal)
  • Expressions of hopelessness, helplessness, or worthlessness (written / verbal)

REFER – Find the right resources for an undergraduate student

No matter what your undergraduate students bring to you, remember your role, and your limitations. We are (for the most part) not counsellors, therapists, or even experts in all the resources on campus, and many of the issues that face our students will be outside of our scope of experience and expertise. Luckily, there are many people both on and off campus who can help, and knowing how to get to them is a gift you can give your undergraduate students.

The first contact point for undergraduate students who are struggling academically or otherwise should be their undergraduate college, so if you believe that the student requires support at an institutional level, please recommend that they connect with their college. The registrars of the seven U of T colleges have been very well equipped to support their students through a wide variety of challenging situations. If the student consents, you can also reach out to the registrar of their college with them, while they are in your office. Please indicate immediately to the registrar that you have a student in your office if you do this.

In addition to suggesting / facilitating outreach to their college registrar, some students may benefit from a direct connection to U of T’s Health and Wellness Team. This can be accomplished in many ways:

  • You can recommend that they seek out counselling support themselves, and provide them with the contact number (416-978-8030; select option 5 to connect to reception immediately)
  • If they want support with this process:
    • You can assist with a referral. Note that you will need their consent to instigate a referral on their behalf. Complete this form, and email it to Health and Wellness.
    • You can also call Health and Wellness while they are in your office, if they consent to this, and help them launch a self-referral

Please read about the various counselling options and supports that UofT offers – it can be useful to let students know that they may be able to access a drop in or same-day appointment if necessary.

There are also a vast array of additional resources available to our undergraduate students, and depending on their unique circumstances, one or more of these may be relevant and helpful. Some high impact resources are available on our Department’s Health and Wellness landing page, and many others can be found on the faculty-facing IAR Quick Reference Guide, and at U of T’s Student Mental Health Resources page.

If you have specific safety concerns at this stage, you may require an immediate referral or intervention. If the situation is an EMERGENCY, call 911, or call the urgent Campus Police number (416-978-2222). If the situation is URGENT but is not an emergency, you might consider calling the Student Crisis Line (416-946-7111) or UofT Health and Wellness (416-978-8030; select option 5 to connect to reception immediately) – these services are available during business hours only. Examples of specific safety concerns include:

  • References to self-harm or harm to others (including you)
  • Confusion, disorientation, disconnection from reality (written / verbal)
  • Expressions of hopelessness, helplessness, or worthlessness (written / verbal)

Remember that you cannot force a student to accept a referral. However, if they refuse / seem unlikely to connect with their college registrar, you should reach out to the registrar directly to indicate concern for the student. Any important emails of this nature should be copied to our department’s Undergraduate Coordinator.

Importantly, after you connect with a student, follow up with them regarding their progress.

QUESTIONS? – Where to ask for help if you don’t know what to do next

If you aren’t sure where to look for support or what to do next for an undergraduate student, please feel free to reach out directly to our department’s undergraduate coordinator.

   Graduate students

IDENTIFY – If an issue is suspected or disclosed

Students may demonstrate a pattern of behaviour that suggests an active or incipient mental heath concern.

In the laboratory environment (e.g. MSc / PhD research student, rotation student) this might include, but is not limited to:

  • Ceasing attending the lab, or creating disruptions in the lab
  • Not communicating with their direct supervisor in the lab, and being unresponsive to email or phone outreach
  • Failing to complete work to the same degree of competency that they have previously demonstrated
  • Being visibly / obviously sad, upset, angry, or agitated

In a course / classroom environment, this might include but is not limited to:

  • Ceasing to attend lectures, tutorials, or laboratory sessions
  • Not handing in assignments, or handing in work that does not align with previous performance
  • Missing tests, midterms, or exams
  • Being visibly / obviously sad, upset, angry, or agitated
  • Behaving in a way that is out of character

As a Teaching Assistant, this might include but is not limited to:

  • Ceasing to attend required lectures, tutorials, or laboratory sessions
  • Not communicating with you / the course coordinator and being unresponsive to email or phone outreach
  • Not performing their TA duties, or not performing these duties to the same caliber that they have in the past

If you notice a concerning behaviour, invite open communication. Ensure that your students know that they can talk to you, and that there is a pre-defined way for them to connect with you (e.g. an “open door” office walk in policy, regularly scheduled meetings, clearly posted office hours), and that they are free to discuss issues that are affecting their research / academic / professional progress without judgement.

Alternatively, a graduate student may approach you to disclose a mental health concern. In either case, being able to recognize when someone is experiencing a mental health challenge is an important first step in helping them.

If you have specific safety concerns at this stage, you may require an immediate referral or intervention. If the situation is an EMERGENCY, call 911, or call the urgent Campus Police number (416-978-2222). If the situation is URGENT but is not an emergency, you might consider calling the Student Crisis Line (416-946-7111) or UofT Health and Wellness (416-978-8030; select option 5 to connect to reception immediately) – these services are available during business hours only. Examples of specific safety concerns include:

  • References to self-harm or harm to others (including you)
  • Confusion, disorientation, disconnection from reality (written / verbal)
  • Expressions of hopelessness, helplessness, or worthlessness (written / verbal)

ASSIST – Figure out how to best help a graduate student

If you’re concerned about one of your graduate students, whether you are their direct supervisor, an instructor in one of their courses, or their supervisor in their Teaching Assistant position, consider providing specific examples that highlight your reason(s) for being concerned. This will let the student know that you are open to listening, and gives them a chance to speak directly to the indicators you’ve presented. Consider the following procedural elements to this conversation, which apply whether you have approached a graduate student with a concern, or if a student has approached you:

  • Choose a safe space to have the conversation – best practice for in person meetings, keep your office door open, even if just a little bit
  • Validate their feelings / disclosures, and listen actively
  • Do not promise confidentiality – you may not be able to keep their secrets
  • Avoid giving advice
  • Instill a sense of hope – whatever the issue is, there will be a way to navigate it

If you have specific safety concerns at this stage, you may require an immediate referral or intervention. If the situation is an EMERGENCY, call 911, or call the urgent Campus Police number (416-978-2222). If the situation is URGENT but is not an emergency, you might consider calling the Student Crisis Line (416-946-7111) or UofT Health and Wellness (416-978-8030; select option 5 to connect to reception immediately) – these services are available during business hours only. Examples of specific safety concerns include:

  • References to self-harm or harm to others (including you)
  • Confusion, disorientation, disconnection from reality (written / verbal)
  • Expressions of hopelessness, helplessness, or worthlessness (written / verbal)

REFER – Find the right resources for your graduate student

No matter what your graduate students bring to you, remember your role, and your limitations. We are (for the most part) not counsellors, therapists, or even experts in all the resources on campus, and many of the issues that face our students will be outside of our scope of experience and expertise. Luckily, there are many people both on and off campus who can help, and knowing how to get to them is a gift you can give your graduate students.

The first contact point for graduate students who are struggling academically or otherwise is generally their supervisor (MSc / PhD) or program director (MSc GC / MHSc), so if you are not this person, and you believe that the student requires support, you may want to recommend that they connect with this person. If this is not a reasonable option for whatever reason and you believe that the student requires direct support at the departmental level, you may want to encourage the student to connect with the department’s excellent Graduate Coordinator team, Drs. Lori Frappier and Mike Wilson.

If you are the program director or direct supervisor of a graduate student and are trying to support them through a mental health challenge, make sure that you are aware of the personal time off policy developed by the School of Graduate Studies, which mandates that all graduate students be allowed to take 15 business days off annually to support their wellbeing. A short break may be incredibly helpful to a struggling graduate student, especially if they know that they have their supervisor’s support in taking this time off.

Some students may also benefit from a direct connection to UofT’s Health and Wellness Team. This can be accomplished in many ways:

  • You can recommend that they seek out counselling support themselves, and provide them with the contact number (416-978-8030; select option 5 to connect to reception immediately). Students should identify themselves here as graduate students within the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, so that they can take advantage of our Division’s embedded counsellors, and receive more tailored counselling support. Note that these counsellors are generally not available during the summer term.
  • If they want support with this process:
    • You can assist with a referral. Note that you will need their consent to instigate a referral on their behalf. Complete this form, and email it to Health and Wellness.
    • You can also call Health and Wellness while they are in your office, if they consent to this, and help them launch a self-referral. In some instances, it may even be helpful after doing this to directly walk a student over to the Koffler Centre and deliver them to the reception desk for further support.

Please read about the various counselling options and supports that UofT offers – it can be useful to let students know that they may be able to access a drop in or same-day appointment if necessary.

There are also a vast array of additional resources available to our graduate students, and depending on their unique circumstances, one or more of these may be relevant and helpful. Some high impact resources are available on our Department’s Health and Wellness landing page, and many others can be found on the faculty-facing IAR Quick Reference Guide, and at UofT’s Student Mental Health Resources page.

If you have specific safety concerns at this stage, you may require an immediate referral or intervention. If the situation is an EMERGENCY, call 911, or call the urgent Campus Police number (416-978-2222). If the situation is URGENT but is not an emergency, you might consider calling the Student Crisis Line (416-946-7111) or UofT Health and Wellness (416-978-8030; select option 5 to connect to reception immediately) – these services are available during business hours only. Examples of specific safety concerns include:

  • References to self-harm or harm to others (including you)
  • Confusion, disorientation, disconnection from reality (written / verbal)
  • Expressions of hopelessness, helplessness, or worthlessness (written / verbal)

In some circumstances, a mental health situation will require that your graduate student take a formal break from their academic work. Please become familiar with the leave of absence policy developed by the School of Graduate Studies, and in the event that you think this might be meaningful or necessary for a student, consider suggesting this path.

Remember that you cannot force a student to accept a referral, and importantly, after you connect with a graduate student, follow up with them regarding their progress.

QUESTIONS? – Where to ask for help if you don’t know what to do next

If you aren’t sure where to look for support or what to do next for a graduate student, please feel free to reach out directly to our department’s many graduate contact points:

   Faculty and Staff

IDENTIFY – If an issue is suspected or disclosed

Non-student members of our community may also struggle with their mental health. This section covers all of the staff members in our department, from laboratory employees and post-doctoral fellows to faculty members.

Staff and faculty members may demonstrate a pattern of behaviour that suggests an active or incipient mental heath concern. This might include, but is not limited to:

  • Ceasing attending work, or creating disruptions in their work environment
  • Not performing their duties, or not performing these duties to the same caliber that they have in the past
  • Not communicating with their direct supervisor (staff) or trainees (staff / faculty), and being unresponsive to email or phone outreach
  • Failing to complete work to the same degree of competency that they have previously demonstrated
  • Being visibly / obviously sad, upset, angry, or agitated

If you notice a concerning behaviour, invite open communication. Ensure that the staff and faculty members of our community know that they can talk to you, and in the case of staff members or post-doctoral fellows in your research group, that there is a pre-defined way for them to connect with you (e.g. an “open door” office walk in policy, regularly scheduled meetings), and that they are free to discuss issues that are affecting their research / professional progress without judgement.

Alternatively, a staff or faculty member may approach you to disclose a mental health concern. In either case, being able to recognize when someone is experiencing a mental health challenge is an important first step in helping them.

If you have specific safety concerns at this stage, you may require an immediate referral or intervention. If the situation is an EMERGENCY, call 911, or call the urgent Campus Police number (416-978-2222). If the situation is URGENT but is not an emergency, you might consider calling the Student Crisis Line (416-946-7111) or UofT Health and Wellness (416-978-8030; select option 5 to connect to reception immediately) – these services are available during business hours only. Examples of specific safety concerns include:

  • References to self-harm or harm to others (including you)
  • Confusion, disorientation, disconnection from reality (written / verbal)
  • Expressions of hopelessness, helplessness, or worthlessness (written / verbal)

ASSIST – Figure out how to best help a staff or faculty member

If you’re concerned about a non-student member of our community, whether you are their direct employer or a colleague, consider providing specific examples that highlight your reason(s) for being concerned. This will let them know that you are open to listening, and gives them a chance to speak directly to the indicators you’ve presented. Consider the following procedural elements to this conversation, which apply whether you have approached someone with a concern, or if someone has approached you:

  • Choose a safe space to have the conversation – best practice for in person meetings, keep your office door open, even if just a little bit
  • Validate their feelings / disclosures, and listen actively
  • Do not promise confidentiality – you may not be able to keep their secrets
  • Avoid giving advice
  • Instill a sense of hope – whatever the issue is, there will be a way to navigate it

If you have specific safety concerns at this stage, you may require an immediate referral or intervention. If the situation is an EMERGENCY, call 911, or call the urgent Campus Police number (416-978-2222). If the situation is URGENT but is not an emergency, you might consider calling the Student Crisis Line (416-946-7111) or UofT Health and Wellness (416-978-8030; select option 5 to connect to reception immediately) – these services are available during business hours only. Examples of specific safety concerns include:

  • References to self-harm or harm to others (including you)
  • Confusion, disorientation, disconnection from reality (written / verbal)
  • Expressions of hopelessness, helplessness, or worthlessness (written / verbal)

REFER – Find the right resources for a staff or faculty member

No matter what the situation, remember your role, and your limitations. We are (for the most part) not counsellors, therapists, or even experts in all the resources on campus, and many of the issues that face our community members will be outside of our scope of experience and expertise. Luckily, there are many people both on and off campus who can help, and knowing how to get to them is a gift you can give your employees and colleagues.

The first contact point for a staff member, postdoctoral fellow, or faculty member who is struggling with a mental health situation is the Employee And Family Assistance Plan. This is available 24/7 to all employees of UofT and their dependents, and is completely free. EFAP provides confidential short-term counselling, coaching, information and support for all types of issues relating to mental health and wellbeing. Depending on the situation, a staff or faculty member may also benefit from a referral to the Family Care Office, which offers a wide variety of counselling and crisis support services. Additional helpful information for navigating wellness at UofT for staff and faculty can be found at the Division of People Strategy, Equity, and Culture’s Wellness Hub.

If you are the direct supervisor or employer of a staff member or postdoctoral fellow and are trying to support them through a mental health challenge, make sure that you are aware of the vacation time and personal time off allotments provided in their employment contracts. A short break may be incredibly helpful to a struggling staff member or postdoctoral fellow, especially if they know that they have their supervisor’s support in taking this time off.

If you have specific safety concerns at this stage, you may require an immediate referral or intervention. If the situation is an EMERGENCY, call 911, or call the urgent Campus Police number (416-978-2222). If the situation is URGENT but is not an emergency, you might consider calling the Student Crisis Line (416-946-7111) or UofT Health and Wellness (416-978-8030; select option 5 to connect to reception immediately) – these services are available during business hours only. Examples of specific safety concerns include:

  • References to self-harm or harm to others (including you)
  • Confusion, disorientation, disconnection from reality (written / verbal)
  • Expressions of hopelessness, helplessness, or worthlessness (written / verbal)

Remember that you cannot force a staff member, postdoctoral fellow, or faculty member to accept a referral, and importantly, after you connect with a community member, follow up with them regarding their progress.

QUESTIONS? – Where to ask for help if you don’t know what to do next

If you aren’t sure how to best support a staff member or another faculty member, consider reaching out to EFAP – in addition to providing a direct contact point for employees at UofT, this service is also open to supervisors and managers who are hoping to get some advice on navigating challenging situations and support their employees and colleagues.

If you need insight or advice on how to best support a staff or faculty member in the context of our department, feel free to reach out to the department Chair, Dr. Tim Hughes, or the Mentorship Coordinator, Dr. Will Navarre.

How to prevent harassment and assist students who are being harassed

It is your duty to create a lab environment that is safe for all members of our community. Set a good example and foster a healthy lab / classroom culture, where it is clear that you do not think certain types of jokes / ways of behaving / conversations are appropriate or acceptable.

Here are steps to achieve that:

  • Follow and enforce the code of conduct (see faculty and student handbook, as well as the University's Code of Student Conduct).
  • Obtain training on the topic, and encourage people in your lab to take the training also (especially those people with supervisory roles).
  • Care personally: be an available and empathic mentor that students are feel comfortable talking to. Consider following the IAR methodology outlined above when discussing the situation with a member of the community who is disclosing a harassment situation to you.
  • Provide information on reporting structure (for example in the lab onboarding booklet):  understand confidentiality issues around expressing a concern and disclosing a situation that requires action.
  • Make it a lab policy to be aware of key guidelines, such as the University's Guideline on Workplace Harassment and Civil Conduct.
  • Refer students for additional support, for example to the Sexual Violence Prevention & Support Centre.
  • Seek guidance if you have more questions. For example, talk to the Department’s Vice-Chair, Education & Operations. Support from departmental leadership can help provide a framework for difficult conversations with respondents, and for outlining a department-level action plan and consequences if required.

Tips for responding to a harassment situation

  • If a student discloses harassment to you, let them know early in the conversation (ideally prior to the disclosure) that you are ready to listen and that you are invested in their safety and comfort, but that you can’t guarantee confidentiality, pending the nature of the disclosure.
  • Let them know that if you have a safety concern, it will need to be reported up to senior leadership in the department, but that at their request you can remove their identifying information.
  • During and after the disclosure, let the student know that you believe them. Limit questions to procedural ones, such as:
    • Are you comfortable continuing to work in your lab / attend this class?
    • Would you like to make a formal report?
    • Would you like support initiating the reporting process?
    • Would you like some help figuring out short term accommodations?
  • Thank the student for their willingness to confide in you.
  • Encourage the student to contact the appropriate campus office (e.g. the Sexual Violence Prevention & Support Centre, in the case of sexual violence / harassment) to explore available options, seek feedback, and decide whether they want to pursue a formal report. Remember that you cannot force a student to accept a referral.
  • Keep the discloser in the loop - before you action any plan, escalate a situation, or impose any consequences on another community member, discuss with the student who disclosed the incident.
  • After a disclosure, follow up with the student who disclosed their circumstance to you to:
    • See how they’re managing practically (e.g. if they are attending classes and / or their lab), and emotionally / socially (e.g. if they would benefit from help finding some support resources.
    • Keep them informed about any developments or updates concerning the situation in question.
  • Remember that your first priority is supporting the student / community member who disclosed harassment to you.

How to proceed with a student who has disengaged from the program

Students are expected to maintain regular contact throughout their program, but occasionally, students disengage, no longer showing up to the lab or responding to regular communications from you and lab members, without prior discussion. This is a concern for their continued academic progress, but also for their well-being.

The Department has processes in place to follow up with students and verify well-being, including reaching out to emergency contacts and escalating the case to the Student Crisis Response & Student Progress team. As Supervisor, your responsibility is to initiate this process when a student has been absent for an unusual and unexpected amount of time, by emailing the student and CCing the Learning Strategist to notify the department.

The exact timing when absence becomes a concern will depend on the student and their typical pattern of communication and presence in the lab; use your discretion, but err on the side of caution. This can include cases when students unexpectedly do not return from a planned absence. It’s important to directly communicate your concern and alert students that the situation will be escalated if they continue not to respond. We recommend using the following email template, and leaving a phone message reviewing the same information.

Email template for corresponding with disengaged students

   To: [student]

   Cc: [MoGen Learning Strategist, mogen.learning@utoronto.ca]

   Subject: Action Required: Respond to confirm wellbeing

Dear [student name],

I hope you are alright. I am writing to you because you have not responded to any communication from me since [date], and I am concerned about your wellbeing.

Please contact me or our Department’s Learning Strategist (cc’d) within 3 business days. We can discuss your present situation and ensure that you have access to any supports you need.

If we do not hear from you within 3 business days, a staff member from the Department will attempt to contact you directly, and then contact your emergency contact(s), if you have provided one.

[sign-off and signature]

This template can be adapted, but should include the same basic information. You can add specifics to this communication or send a follow-up to the Learning Strategist with further information.

The Learning Strategist will then inform the Graduate Coordinators and organize further communications.

The departmental funding policy also specifies that stipend support may be ended after extended periods of unplanned absence and nonresponse. However, this only happens when the proper process is followed; stipend coverage can only end one month after the Learning Strategist has alerted the student to this possibility via email.

Please note: This protocol is to be followed when the only reason to be concerned for the student’s well-being and safety is their unusual absence. If you have specific safety concerns at this stage, you may require an immediate referral or intervention. If the situation is an EMERGENCY, call 911, or call the urgent Campus Police number (416-978-2222). If the situation is URGENT but is not an emergency, you might consider calling the Student Crisis Line (416-946-7111) or UofT Health and Wellness (416-978-8030; select option 5 to connect to reception immediately) – these services are available during business hours only. Examples of specific safety concerns include:

  • References to self-harm or harm to others (including you)
  • Confusion, disorientation, disconnection from reality (written / verbal)
  • Expressions of hopelessness, helplessness, or worthlessness (written / verbal)

Undergraduate teaching

someone putting up their hand while someone is presenting

Understanding the Administration of Undergraduate Education

Our department educates hundreds of undergraduate students each year, many of whom are pursuing a BSc with a major or specialization in our Molecular Genetics and Microbiology program.  Many undergraduate students also do research in our laboratories as summer students or as part of a research course like ROP299 or MGY480.

For many reasons, the relationship our department has with its undergraduate students is less direct than it is with the students in our graduate programs.

Our program makes up only part of the degree requirements for undergraduate students.  Many are enrolled in other programs (double-majors) and all students must complete breadth requirements (courses outside of life science) to obtain their degree.  Molecular Genetics is not responsible for ensuring that students complete these other requirements.

Undergraduate students are enrolled through the Faculty of Arts and Science (FAS), not Temerty.  The Molecular Genetics and Microbiology undergraduate program is primarily overseen by FAS through agreements negotiated between Temerty and FAS. 

Undergraduate Colleges

Undergraduate students are affiliated with a college and most aspects of an undergraduate’s academic life are overseen by their college registrar.  The college, not Molecular Genetics, serves as the primary ‘academic home’ of an undergraduate student.

Undergraduate students in your lab

How to get undergraduate students for your lab

There are variety of options for incorporating undergraduate researcher into labs in Molecular Genetics. Below is a list of the most common research opportunities for undergraduates.

Work study

Eligibility: Undergraduates enrolled in a course who are available to work up to 200 hours during the fall/winter term and up to 100 hours in the winter term.

Process: Submit job posting and then contact students you are interested in having in your lab. Job posting deadline is typically March for the summer and July for fall/winter.

Program link

Undergraduate Summer research program

Eligibility: Undergraduates who can commit to full time research for 12-16 weeks between the beginning of May to the end of August. There are several fellowship opportunities available to supplement the undergraduate stipend.

Process: Have students you would like to join your lab in the summer complete the undergraduate summer research program application. Deadline is typically sometime in March.

Program link

Research opportunity program (ROP)

Eligibility: Second- or third-year students with a time commitment of 8-10 hours during fall and/or winter term and 18-20 hours during the summer term.

Process: Applications for student projects are typically due in middle of January and offers made to students at the beginning of April.

Program link

Fourth year thesis (MYGY480)

Eligibility: Fourth year students with a time commitment of 8-12 hours per week during fall and winter term.

Process: Have students you would like to do their fourth-year thesis in your lab enroll in the course. See link below for details.

Course link

Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (BCB) program

If you are looking for predominantly computational students, email the program coordinator of the BCB program to be listed as participating faculty.

Program link

RASI

RASI is an initiative designed to help Community of Support members (COS - supports prospective health professions students who are Indigenous, Black, Filipino, socioeconomically disadvantaged, or who identify as having a disability) with interests in pursuing research.

RASI website

Community of Support website

To participate, complete this form where you fill out information about when you would like to host students, how many, funding, lab information, and topic. Then, your information will be distributed to the students (not on a website for public access as far as I know) and students begin to contact you. You are then responsible for interviewing, selecting, hiring students and you must let the RASI lead know when you take a student so they can take you off the list (by email). You provide the funding for this program, although students could apply for UROPS, etc.

Undergraduate teaching resources

  • Arts and Sciences Academic Handbook
  • We teach undergraduate courses in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, which has additional resources we can access, including consultations on course design and related topics. Workshops and consultations from the Centre for Teaching Support & Innovation are also available.
  • Academic integrity: We hold our students to the highest standards with regards to academic integrity and protecting intellectual property.
    Note that students who have been trained in different locations may not be familiar with what the definition or boundaries of academic integrity are at our institution; it is therefore worth confirming your expectations with your students.
  • Accessibility Services: Students who require accommodations apply through Accessibility Services. You will receive a letter from a student or their advisor listing their required accommodations. In some instances you can grant AS access to your Quercus course so that they can adjust timelines for students via Quercus directly. They are also a great resource for discuss more complex accommodation requests.
  • Registrar's office of a student's college

Paying students

We strongly suggest that students in your lab either get credit for a lab course, or are paid for their time.

Note that there is disparity of pay between the awards students receive for their placements in your lab (NSERC, UTEA, UROP...). Therefore, the salary is topped up to the harmonized summer student wage (summer 2023: CAD2000/month), yielding the same amount for all students in your lab.

Students who are not on any summer student funding (no UROP or NSERC), but who are doing an undergrad research project, can be given equivalent funding from the PIs grant. Those students must be enrolled in full-time undergraduate or graduate studies immediately prior to the engagement, and have a reasonable expectation that they will continue their full-time studies at the end of the engagement. Other students could be employed as hourly workers with a wage that will allow them to be paid at the same approximate level as their peers who are funded through UROPs, etc.  This will avoid two-tier payments to different students for equivalent work.

Students who are doing non-project work (cleaning glassware) can be employed as hourly workers.  Many can be hired through the work study program.

We discourage volunteers in your lab for three reasons: 1. Students are only covered by OHSA workplace safety regulations when they are paid. 2. Paid research positions ensure equity between students by allowing students to get valuable lab experience when they would otherwise have to take on non-scientific paid positions. 3. Making sure that student get either academic credit or payment avoids exploitation.

Training resources

Very strongly suggest to all members of the department. The asynchronous online module is offered in versions specific for faculty, staff and students.
Very strongly suggested to all faculty and to mentoring grad students/postdocs/staff to support student mental health.
The Anti-Racism & Cultural Diversity Office offers professional development courses to increase faculty and staff’s understanding of their roles/responsibilities and key strategies to advancing racial equity, diversity and inclusion at U of T.
Four-module course designed to address unconscious bias.
The video on implicit bias during virtual interviews is extremely useful for anyone on an admissions committee and who conducts virtual interviews.
Workshop organized by the Centre for Graduate Mentorship & Supervision. A very helpful 5 step process for having difficult conversations with tips for when to schedule & how to proceed.

Resources for faculty members

Resources for funding, safety, teaching

Forms and links for the department's grad program (courses, exams, etc)
Foundational resources the university provides
Onboarding guide created by the Division of the Vice-President, Research & Innovation (VPRI) to get new faculty oriented to research-specific resources and processes as they transition into their new role at U of T.
UTFA helps and represents faculty on matters related to academic appointments.
Mentorship
The Chair will assign new PIs a mentor for individual guidance.
Reclass exams
We recommend that new faculty members audit reclass exams.
The Centre for Teaching Support & Innovation (CTSI) provides leadership in teaching and learning at the University of Toronto and provides support for pedagogy and pedagogy-driven instructional technology
The Family Care Office provides confidential guidance, resources, referrals, educational programming and advocacy for the University of Toronto community and their families.
Managing facilities information, facilities operations and space management both throughout the building that are located on the University of Toronto campus and off campus in the area buildings and hospitals.
At the beginning of your Assistant Professorship, make yourself familiar with the requirements for the academic promotion process.
Environmental and Health Services ensure that an environmentally responsible, safe and healthy work, research and study environment exists at the University of Toronto. Find information on biosafety, labsafety, radiation protection etc.
Information about latest funding opportunities and awards, partnership opportunities, commercialization activity, new technologies and startups.

Handbook version

Version 2.1 (November 2024, updated training options)

Version 2 (August 2024, clarification on policy for graduate student time off in lab onboarding information, and funding policy [new section on Departmental funding policy and new section on how to proceed with a student who has disengaged from the program])

Version 1.1 (added mention of DiscoverResearch, added mentor expectation "Exam scheduling")

Version 1.0 (September 2023, first release to faculty)

Draft 2 (July 7 2023 - before committee review)

Draft 1 (June 8 2023)